I'll start by saying that I'm biased. I ditched satellite and cable a little over a year ago in favor of internet TV. I upped my bandwidth to the max available, subscribed to Netflix and Hulu plus, and bought a Roku.
Admittedly I'm not the average use case. I've never been one to avidly follow a show or wait excitedly for the next episode of something to come out. I'm also not much of a sports fan (meaning that I can't remember the last time that I watched sports on TV). These things, along with my geek tendency to make new tech work regardless of how much of a pain it is, and wanting to cut seventy dollars a month out of my budget made my switch a no brainer.
I went into it knowing that there would be shows that I couldn't get. CBS has infamously blocked it's content from anything other than TV and a PC Web browser. Those are the first pitfalls for the average consumer though. "No live sports?", "You can't get this show?" and "That sounds complicated" are the first things that I hear. The first two would be simple enough to fix with cooperation from content creators, but first they have to decide that it's in their best interest. The third is just a design question. With enough market interest there's always someone willing to invest the R&D capital to make an attempt at a better design. I think that there's another, much larger, obstacle that IPTV has to overcome, the social aspect.
There is seldom a day that goes by without my interacting with someone around something on television. Most often it's sports, but the incredible popularity of shows like American Idol, Mad Men and Glee have started plenty of conversations about regular programming. That's where one of my favorite features becomes a shortcoming. Shows are released on a schedule, but they are watched whenever you want. Having everything on demand is really convenient, but it makes it hard to talk about what came on last night. Network and cable television schedules have kept people on the same wavelength for decades. That's a lot of social conditioning to push against.
The DVR started this trend toward on-demand viewing. Because of the Tivo we had to start thinking about spoiler alerts when talking or writing about TV shows. It's still not there though. We're still trained to think in terms like "prime time" and "channel guide". To be truly mainstream, IPTV will have to find a way to reshape this norm.
I'm pretty sure there are literally 0 shows that could make me regret dropping cable. It's just so damn expensive... there's nothing they could put on TV that would make paying that monthly fee worth it. Netflix and Youtube have more than I could ever possibly "need" in terms of stuff to watch.
ReplyDeleteFred - NoCable.org
Not to mention that there are plenty of places to purchase ore rent almost any show that yo HAVE to see.
DeleteJason - there WILL come a time where the rising cost of Internet service providers in your area will make you think twice about cable again. This is the "tipping point" that industry economists talk about and it is probably 2-3 more years away. Cable and DSL Internet providers will continue to see diminishing (but still healthy) profits until then.
ReplyDeleteI don't really see that as a valid point though. Regardless of my media consumption, internet is an essential part of my life, and I would venture to say that of a large number of people. If it was an either or situation, I could see this, but the only question is whether I'll pay for my video to cable providers or over the top services.
DeleteHonestly, since I wrote this things have changed a lot. Four years ago the struggle was to find what I wanted to watch from an online provider. Now the struggle is finding time to watch all of the great content. Oh, and Amazon started including Prime Video with my Prime subscription, so another option with no increase in cost.
For instance, think about a sport with a ten % home benefit – which is fairly typical. This means that over the long run|the lengthy term}, the sport will return 10 % of all wagers it accepts to the casino that owns it. So if it accepts $1 million in wagers over 2 million spins, it will be anticipated to pay out $900,000, resulting in a casino acquire of $100,000. Thus from the management’s perspective, the “price” it expenses is the 10 % it expects to collect from gamblers over time. Be conscious that the payout numbers could apply 코인카지노 to a bank of machines as opposed to particular person items , and not all machines in that row pays out the identical.
ReplyDelete